Gonna have to agree with Hachi here for once, you shouldn’t really reencode lossy audio unless it starts off at a quite high bitrate.
However, I can disagree with him on the second point at least. An encode from anything posted here that isn’t a BDMV/BDRemux needs to be red, so it’s currently correctly flagged.
@HachiRokuNiSanKyu Yes the original audio is aac.
Helps in reducing the file size… as Opus has superior quality compared to AAC at the same bitrate… we prefer opus
@Animorphs you may be right but converting a lossy audio to higher bitrate than the source create artifacts but compressing to Opus 96 kb/s which is almost equivalent to AAC 128 kb/s should be fine.
Comments - 5
HachiRokuNiSanKyu
OPUS lol. What a stupid meme. Isn’t the original audio already AAC? What difference would transcoding make?
HachiRokuNiSanKyu
Also, this shouldn’t be a re-encode, since SubsPlease isn’t encoded.
Animorphs
Gonna have to agree with Hachi here for once, you shouldn’t really reencode lossy audio unless it starts off at a quite high bitrate.
However, I can disagree with him on the second point at least. An encode from anything posted here that isn’t a BDMV/BDRemux needs to be red, so it’s currently correctly flagged.
Also, it’s Opus not OPUS
Nuna75 (uploader)
@HachiRokuNiSanKyu Yes the original audio is aac.
Helps in reducing the file size… as Opus has superior quality compared to AAC at the same bitrate… we prefer opus
Nuna75 (uploader)
@Animorphs you may be right but converting a lossy audio to higher bitrate than the source create artifacts but compressing to Opus 96 kb/s which is almost equivalent to AAC 128 kb/s should be fine.
(Also, it’s Opus not OPUS)
Noted.