Evangelion: 3.0+1.11 Thrice Upon a Time Specials [BDRemux] [1080p] :: Nyaa ISS

Evangelion: 3.0+1.11 Thrice Upon a Time Specials [BDRemux] [1080p]

Category:
Date:
2023-03-10 19:08 UTC
Submitter:
Seeders:
3
Information:
No information.
Leechers:
1
File size:
9.5 GiB
Completed:
381
Info hash:
feee32272fa4b2dbe1eec9a8fc2f0c3df0ff88a9
[MAL - Evangelion: 3.0 (-46h) You Can (Not) Redo.](https://myanimelist.net/anime/53246)

File list

I know that (-46) is the new special… what is the (-120) special?

ElderKai (uploader)

User
@uberasian (-120min) is EVA-EXTRA-EXTRA Manga.
You could remux the audios and avoid x2 waste space? 200-300MB is nothing. Thanks, i was looking for this. PS: x264 or x265? my pc is slow. English subs?
This is not a re-mux-it's a "re-encode".
zrdb what makes you say that? MediaInfo shows it's straight out of MakeMKV. Without a BDMV/ISO of the bonus disc (can only find dead DDL links) it's safe to assume they _did_ actually put the video on there twice, the audio tracks on both have the same source ID which I don't think is possible within the same m2ts file, `4352 (0x1100)`. Evangelion 3.0 (-120min) You Can (Not) Redo. (2.0).mkv https://files.catbox.moe/kl0rdy.txt Evangelion 3.0 (-120min) You Can (Not) Redo. (5.1).mkv https://files.catbox.moe/ixdx02.txt -46h looks similar, no point in posting long MediaInfo twice. The video streams aren't identical - you can demux them and try and hash them if you want. I doubt anyone would be able to tell the difference, since there's a sizable chunk of the video where the SSIM score is **1.00** and I didn't see it dip below **0.989** - admittedly useless since you can assign either as the "source" - point being, nearly identical, but still different video. Same source, different audio track, slightly lower maximum bitrate allotted to the video with 5.1 audio because `there are less bits available now and we have to stay under 40Mbps` _Technically_ the video track included with the Stereo audio might be higher quality, if `>size` automatically = `>quality` with whatever encoder they used when they authored the disc - but again, even pixel peeping wherever it scored lowest, I'd be arsed if I could tell either from the other. Even x264's output is non-deterministic by default.